MadDemiurg wrote:To all the "balance" complaints, the balance is not that bad imo, there are issues, but no MU is unwinnable if you know what you're doing (I've played all fleets quite a bit). Also a large part of the playerbase is probably SP. where balance doesn't really matter much. So blaming playerbase drop on balance is rather ridiculous I think.
Look at all the balance problems and say that again (hint: Orks weaponry + ships + upgrades + favours, Eldar weaponry + ships, Tau favours and ships).
And there are actually quite a few/lot who left because of stupid balance changes.
McNash wrote:-Finally, most of you really have no real power about how good the game will fare, on the other hand you can try to take it down, but you all are ultimately futile as you don't even represent 10 percent of the gaming population of BFG:A.
There were people who wanted to organize tournaments and other stuff. Such things can influence how a game will fare big time.
By the way, why is that so many testers of this game have ended up throwing mud to it? One my expect developers to look for people who will unconditionally support them, I mean, look at some of the DoW3 mods, they seem to have the whole day to defend the technical and design choices done by Relic.
Unconditionally support devs?
That's the worst kind of testers you can get if you want to improve and you should never expect someone to unconditionally support you, especially when you lie to those people and ignore them on many occasions.